On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:29:39PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > > >When you accused me of interpreting official documents "pedanticaly", I > >wondered what you meant exactly with being pedantic. > > Please don't top-post, it makes the baby Jesus cry. > > More seriously - the constitution clearly defines what can and can't be > done with GRs. The social contract's "We will not hide problems" makes > no clear statement about how certain kinds of business should be carried > out. The two situations are not desperately analagous. A decision through inaction is still a decision... this proposal seems to fit with 4.1 3 just fine to me. > (Context for those not on #debian-devel - I suggested that a more > appropriate mechanism for dealing with this problem would have been for > private discussion to have taken place in a non-confrontational manner. > Robert suggested that this would be breaching clause 3 of the social > contract) More private discussion with whom ourselves? ftpmaster refuses to comment on any email sent them, the only way I managed to get Daniel to respond was that he was already asking me questions on irc about an unrelated matter, so I essentially trapped him into responding. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature