Re: Results for future handling of the non free section GR
On 23 Mar 2004 09:51:39 -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
>> This is a matter of opinion. I find the beats table as originally
>> depicted far cleaner -- and easier to read -- than the more verbose
>> format you prescribe.
> It took me a lot of substraction to figure out whether it was "row
> beats column" or "column beats row"! I think it's clear only once
> you have spent energy on it. But I think having more formats is
> easy...
Hmm. The meaning of the row vs columns is out there in the
results itself, you know. However: here is the new results.txt; there
should be something in it for everyone.
manoj
######################################################################
Starting results calculation at Mon Mar 22 08:09:36 2004
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 169 199
Option 2 303 304
Option 3 260 156
Looking at row 2, column 1, Choice 2: Re-affirm support for non-free
received 303 votes over Choice 1: Cease active support of non-free [3:1 majority needed]
Looking at row 1, column 2, Choice 1: Cease active support of non-free [3:1 majority needed]
received 169 votes over Choice 2: Re-affirm support for non-free.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 199 > 45.1995575199581
Option 2 Reached quorum: 304 > 45.1995575199581
Dropping Option 1 because of Majority. 0.765 (199/260) <= 3
Option 2 passes Majority. 1.949 (304/156) > 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 303 - 169) = 134 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 260 - 199) = 61 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 304 - 156) = 148 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 "Choice 2: Re-affirm support for non-free"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 "Choice 2: Re-affirm support for non-free"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
######################################################################
manoj
--
What! shall this speech be spoke for our excuse? Or shall we on
without apology? -- Shakespeare
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: