On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:11:35AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 07:12:36AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:49:52PM -0800, mbc wrote:
> >>I think that consensus is a more democratic method of decision making.
> >Ah, consensus doesn't require voting?
>
> Not in the sense that democrats are used to. But it does involve
> canvassing and finding out everyones position on a matter.
Yeah, and eventually asking everyone "can we agree on this?" Then you
say either "yeah", "nay", or "can we keep discussing please?".
Sounds a hell of a lot like our current voting system to me :-)
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature