Re: A(nother) question to the candidates
(Being a fun candidate has the advantage of being able to ignore any
said and unsaid rules or agreements and whatnot, so I can answer every
mail I want to >;)
> I have seen lots of discussions about CDD and splitting up Debian
> into a core and more-or-less independent topic specific sections recently.
> While I can perfectly understand the motivation behind
> these discussions, I have one particular "fear" in this direction.
> To the candidates: What do you think how we should
> determine which software components go into the
> core system, and which have to go into separately provided
> "distros"? On which criteria, in our opinion, should
> we base those decisions?
In my opinion, the default setup should be kept as is - everything is
debian core. The separation should be optional, so hardcore users will
feel at home, while newer, less experienced ones will use the distros
layer.
Hm. This is not good. This seems to be a sensical answer. EEEK! HELP!
I'M SICK! SOMEONE PLEASE PASS OVER THE PIPE!
THANKS!
--
Gergelybrush Pipewood
Reply to: