Re: "keep non-free" proposal
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 06:56:03PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> So why is mpg123 in the non-free area anymore? Is anyone willing to
> say it's necessary? And if not, why didn't it get dropped sooner?
It's necessary for Asterisk music-on-hold, because mpg321 can't resample its
output. There are some patches floating around for Asterisk to use sox to
resample instead, but I don't think upstream has accepted them.
It looks like this is bug #118283.
--
Robert Woodcock - rcw@debian.org
perl -e '$a-=($_%4-2)*4/$_++while++$_<2e6;print"$a\n"'
Reply to: