[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Keep non-free



On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:40:49PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > > >hardware manufacturers (in the last instance) only. Do you think that
> > > > >they produce everything built in their devices?
> > > > 
> > > > Do you really think that hardware manufacturers don't decide what to 
> > > > build into their devices?
> > > 
> > > Of course they do, but they have different primary goals, eg. produce
> > > the hardware product in this century, make it good enough to sell enough
> > > of it. Or do you prefer hardware that is 10 times slower or incompatible
> > > to what 95% of the market uses, beeing 200% more expensive?
> > 
> > Ah, the old argument that says free software can never possibly work
> > or compete with commercial software.
> 
> fwiw: free software and commercial software don't exclude each other.
> Guess you are referring to proprietary software instead.

No, it's not *my* argument. I always thought it was a rather silly argument.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: