Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> Because i believe the time of confrontation has not yet come, and that
> the moment to remove non-free from the debian infrastructure (see how
> heavy this construction is over the simpler from debian, which you
> choose to misunderstood). There is no alternative to non-free hardware
> today, so there is not really much we can do about this. But all the
> rest of the non-free software, by all means, get ride of it.
Does this mean that you would support the removal of all of non-free
with the exception of those packages necessary to support closed
hardware?
Thomas
Reply to: