Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section
* Thomas Bushnell, BSG (tb@becket.net) [040308 21:40]:
> Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:
> > No. If you are not satisfied with either text, you can vote for
> > "further discussion". But if the "keep non-free" is the result of this
> > vote, than _please_ don't discuss any more after that. It is decided
> > than, and let's get back to our work after this GR.
> No, the "keep non-free" alternative does not contain any provisions
> limiting future discussion. It is also at best a "keep non-free for
> now" option.
It also does not contain any provision limiting future flaming by me
to anyone who revives that discussion. It is also a "please let us go
back to work" option.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: