Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> This would mean, not having a relative small, and negatively viewed
> non-free repository on the debian archive, but an officially recognized
> proliferation of third party non-free packages we have no control on.
If people want that, they can have it now. Having non-free in Debian
does not prevent it from also existing elsewhere.
Moreover, the whole point is to *not* have it be officially
recognized.
Reply to: