Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org> writes:
> * "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@becket.net> [2004-03-07 14:45]:
> > I was promised that Debian would remain 100% free software. You want
> > to break that promise?
>
> Who says so? Why would the keep of non-free somewhere (might it be
> nonfree.org or our pools) be a break of that promise? non-free is no
> part of Debian and never was. Keeping it somewhere doesn't change that.
Sven and Anthony seem to think it is part of Debian.
Reply to: