Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Em Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:35:37 +0100, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> escreveu:
> > I'm a little unclear on how a "first class free operating system" can
> > be non-free. I guess that's the central problem here.
>
> Tell me again, what hardware are you running, and what licence does your
> BIOS have ? I seriously doubt it is free.
This argument is broken, because Debian is not distributing hardware or
BIOS. Thomas' point still holds: distributing non-free does not really help
us achieve our goals.
Cheers,
--
kov@debian.org: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov>
Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org>
"Não deixe para amanhã, o WML que você pode traduzir hoje!"
http://debian-br.alioth.debian.org/?id=WebWML
Reply to: