Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot

To: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 14:35:37 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 5b1ad678f49e3a34e7521d532907fd42@bouncing.localnet>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040308141815.GA13248@lambda>

On 2004-03-08 14:18:15 +0000 Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>wrote:

A, but you have no problem in having me do more work in order to
maintain my non-free package, which is currently needed for the restof
my debian work. Thanks.


Do we require debian developers to have ADSL now?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Next by Date: Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Previous by thread: Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Next by thread: Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread