[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot



On 2004-03-08 13:20:56 +0000 Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

[...] I don't really care about negative effects on non-free software in general in this case. I support the Suffield drop GR to improve Debian, not to harm non-free.
You don't care about it, or you willingly close your eyes to it, in
order to achieve the short term goal of having debian no more distribute
the non-free section ?

Yes, obviously.

I want a proliferation of third-party free packages for debian. Third party non-free (like j2* packages) already exist and I doubt they would grow as quickly as free ones.
What about binary-only hardware drivers ?

They are drivers for hardware which have the bug of not being free software, but I think you knew that already.

I wish you good luck to run
advanced 3D graphics on powerpc hardware for example, especially on
modern powerbooks.

At present, I have no such need for that hardware. If you do, then I think you should help to fix that bug, instead of writing to us about how unfair it is that some of us don't want to support a bug of someone else's driver any more.

--
MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at
 Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/



Reply to: