Re: tb's questions for the candidates
Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de> writes:
> If you actively take on some responsibility and then fail to actually
> fulfill that responsibility it and/or fail to tell others that somebody
> else needs to do the job, that _is_ to "actively work against these rules
> and decisions" in my book.
No. That would be to *passively* obstruct the rules, and such passive
obstruction is allowed. For this reason the project needs to have
things like an NMU procedure and a QA team to carry the slack when
someone is inactive.
Reply to: