Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> One of the main argument, used by Branden if i remember well, was that
> removing non-free from the debian infrastructure would force authors of
> non-free packages to revise their licence, or users to consider
> alternatives.
>
> Exactly in what way does this still be true if there is a an alternative
> non-free.org archive ?
I can't answer this question; I'm not responsible for Branden's
arguments.
Reply to: