Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther <email@example.com> writes:
> I would be really interested in your response to the part of my post you
> silently skipped, namely :
> Sure, but please tell me, if we are going to move non-free stuff to
> non-free.org, exactly how will that change anything over the current
> situation in regard with packages with problematic licences ?
> Unless naturally you have no response to this question, and there really
> no benefit at all in having non-free on non-free.org over having it in
> the debian servers.
The response is easy: it won't have our name on it anymore, and we
won't be devoting our resources to its support.