Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:

> I would be really interested in your response to the part of my post you
> silently skipped, namely : 
> 
>   Sure, but please tell me, if we are going to move non-free stuff to
>   non-free.org, exactly how will that change anything over the current
>   situation in regard with packages with problematic licences ?
> 
> Unless naturally you have no response to this question, and there really
> no benefit at all in having non-free on non-free.org over having it in
> the debian servers.

The response is easy: it won't have our name on it anymore, and we
won't be devoting our resources to its support.

Thomas