Re: "keep non-free" proposal
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:58:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> But more importantly, Debian is lying. I care about that. It is deeply
> objectionable for Debian to claim that it is "100% Free Software" when it
> isn't even *trying* to be. Just as it is deeply objectionable for RMS to
> claim that GFDL-licensed documents are free in the same way GPL-licensed
> documents are. (Which they aren't.)
I think you're overstating the case here.
It's not "the Debian project" which is "100% Free Software", but --
as you stated not very long ago -- "the Debian distribution". [Or,
as I stated it, "the Debian system".]
But you knew that.
--
Raul
Reply to: