[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "keep non-free" proposal



On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:49:13PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> It would be equivalently a trivial statement. As aj pointed out - even
> Microsoft distributes Software That's 100% Free (some parts of the GNU
> tools in their Unix Services for Windows, for example).

No, they do not -- that software depends on software which is not free,
so it's not 100% free.

-- 
Raul



Reply to: