Re: "keep non-free" proposal
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 05:10:55PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I am pointing out there is another interpretation - a third. You chose
> two interpretations, neither of which (necessarily) are "best". I'm not
> saying mine is either, only pointing out a third interpretation.
For my purposes, it's not distinct. The same rationale which eliminates
[B] is sufficient to eliminate your [C].
> And choosing your interpretations/ assumptions will (naturally) have
> consequences with regard to the ensuing fla^Wdiscussion.
Sure, but I don't see much point in building up a collection of
ever-more-bogus interpretations.
--
Raul
Reply to: