[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFD: Use of @debian.org email addresses



On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:58:47AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Since the DMUP is
> effectively a policy statement of the DSA team, would they necessarily
> be bound to enforce the amended version?  If they wouldn't, is there any
> benefit to attaching this to the DMUP?

4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
   Together, the Developers may:
    3. Override any decision by the Project Leader or a Delegate.

8. The Project Leader's Delegates
   The Project Leader's Delegates:
    1. have powers delegated to them by the Project Leader;
    2. may make certain decisions which the Leader may not make directly,
       including approving or expelling Developers or designating people
       as Developers who do not maintain packages. This is to avoid
       concentration of power, particularly over membership as a
       Developer, in the hands of the Project Leader. 

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

             Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
           http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: