Re: thoughts on potential outcomes for non-free ballot
> > On top of that, we used to distribute shareware. We stopped -- that's
> > not useless to our users, but indicates something about our existing
> > practices.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 06:11:53PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> Was there a change in current practices to cause it, or is it just a
> choice?
I'm not sure -- this is an old memory.
Anyways, I'm dropping this issue, and am working on a redraft
of my proposal which doesn't include that phrase.
[I'll want to confer with my sponsors, once I'm happy with the draft,
to see what they think, but first I need to make sure I'm happy with
the draft.]
> Is this all just a word game to you?
No.
> What is the positive reason for debian to distribute anything in
> non-free?
It benefits some of our users.
--
Raul
Reply to: