Andrew Suffield wrote:
Why? What is it's lineage? Was it introduced improperly? Looks like it has teeth to me - certainly enough to solve this problem. Or does it need to be revised and presented in a GR as a whole?On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:14:13PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:The DMUP is a loosely written document in its current form. It also offers 'examples of what we consider net abuse', which I don't believe should exist in such a policy - rather, a concise list of what is permitted with all else prohibited.The DMUP is a load of crap.Oh, and it has all the teeth of an amoeba
Sam