[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: thoughts on potential outcomes for non-free ballot



On 2004-01-23 11:52:28 +0000 Remi Vanicat <vanicat@debian.org> wrote:

If a license contaminate other software, we very probably can't include
it into non-free, as other non-free package won't follow this rule. So
such a package is not distributable by debian.

That probably doesn't follow. There may be limits to the contamination (such as media type) which prevent it hurting debian's non-free archives. For example, combining classes A-C and E of the "4F License" of http://u-os.org/4f/ would seem to produce a licence like that. (I recommend against using 4F, even though it doesn't have this particular problem.)

--
MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at
 Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/



Reply to: