[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft)



On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:57:51AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:26:19AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > <entire text of 
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01192.html 
> > snipped>
> >
> > Andrew, I love it.  :-)  Every word.
> > 
> > This is so much more important than "non-free or not".  To me anyway.
> 
> In which case you might consider seconding the proposal.

It's not a proposal yet. We (list) have been working on this for a
week or three, and for a few more weeks earlier this year; this is the
third draft I've prepared, not counting Branden's original. I
explained my reasons for doing it this way at the outset. (I've seen
enough tacit approval that I don't think finding seconds will be
difficult).

I am *not* soliciting seconds at this time. Just bug fixes.

[Besides, he's not a developer.]

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: