Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft)

To: asuffield@debian.org
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft)
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:26:19 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 40022FFB.8030800@twcny.rr.com>

<entire text ofhttp://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01192.htmlsnipped>


Andrew, I love it.  :-)  Every word.

This is so much more important than "non-free or not".  To me anyway.

--Nathanael Nerode

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft)
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract
Next by Date: Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea
Previous by thread: Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft)
Next by thread: Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread