Re: High Rate of ballot rejections this year
Hi,
It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
as the reasons for rejection of the ballot, with the MUA and count.
I note that there were tweo succesful votes from people who
use Outlook (and no rejections).
Mutt still impresses.
Number MUA
============================================================================
1 Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
1 Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
1 Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.5 (broccoli)
7 Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
1 Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1
1 Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/20.7
3 Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2
1 Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu)
1 Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter,
10 Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2
3 Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code)
2 Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2
4 Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
2 Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
1 Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
1 Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
1 Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1
1 KMail [version 1.1.99]
6 KMail/1.5
2 KMail/1.5.1
3 KMail/1.5.9
1 Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI)
1 Mew version 3.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
1 Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1
1 Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
1 Mew version 3.2 on XEmacs 21.5-b5 (beets)
2 Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
1 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
1 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
1 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
1 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
1 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030319 Debian/1.3-3
1 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030305
1 Mutt 1.4i (2002-05-29)
1 Mutt/1.2.5.1i
1 Mutt/1.3.17i
1 Mutt/1.3.24i
1 Mutt/1.3.27i
47 Mutt/1.3.28i
44 Mutt/1.4i
141 Mutt/1.5.3i
6 Mutt/1.5.4i
1 Pine.LNX.4.10
1 Pine.LNX.4.21
2 Pine.LNX.4.44
1 Pine.LNX.4.50
1 Pine.LNX.4.53
1 PMS 0.2.19 (http://pythonms.sourceforge.net)
1 SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.4 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Kashiharaji?=
2 Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
2 Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
1 Sylpheed version 0.8.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
1 VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
1 VM 7.03 under Emacs 19.34.1
1 VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1
1 Wanderlust/2.10.0 (Venus) SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.4
4 Wanderlust/2.9.15 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi)
1 Ximian Evolution 1.0.8
1 Ximian Evolution 1.2.0
3 Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
1 beefmail v0.0
1 emacs 21.3.50.15 (via feedmail 8 I)
1 emacs 21.3.50.17 (via feedmail 8 I)
1 exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 (debian 2.5-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev
1 kuvert 1.1.2
1 mnews [version 1.22] 1999-12/19(Sun)
======================================================================
gpg: BAD signature
TYPE: multipart/signed
MUA: SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi" 3
Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 40
Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 3
Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 2
Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 3
Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) 2
Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) 1
Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) 4
Emacs Gnus 2
Wanderlust/2.9.15 1
Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 1
Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 21.2 1
jevim v2.16 3
Unknown 7
Type: text/plain
MUA: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 2 75
======================================================================
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
Type: text/plain
Unsigned 15
QP encoding messed up sig
MUA: KMail/1.5 4
KMail/1.5.1 2
KMail/1.5.9 1
Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) 1
Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) 4
ANT RISCOS Marcel [ver 1.50] 1 28
======================================================================
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
TYPE: multipart/signed
Unknown key 6 6
======================================================================
gpg: no signed data (perhaps QP error?)
Type: multipart/signed;
MUA: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 3
Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 1 4
======================================================================
gpg: CRC error; 2d6bf2 - dc32d6
gpg: quoted printable character in armor - probably
a buggy MTA has been used
MUA: KMail/1.4.3 1
KMail [version 1.3.2] 1
Unknown 1 3
======================================================================
gpg: invalid armor header: =20
Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MUA: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 1
Uknown 1 2
======================================================================
gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data
Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MUA: Pine 1 1
======================================================================
gpg: verify signatures failed: unexpected data
Encrypted Ballot 1
======================================================================
Potential replay attack 3
(one of these is my fault, and a spurious error) 3
======================================================================
Bad ballot: No valid choices detected
Non ASCII char 8
Encrypted ballot 7
No Ballot 1 16
======================================================================
manoj
--
Flattery will get you everywhere.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: