Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential codeexecution
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 13:21, Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> wrote:
> I don't really understand your question. There is no separate security
> archive for volatile, as I understand it.
Oddly enough I understood Tony, yet I don't understand the
Volative+ClamAV situation. Can someone definatively state what is the
holdup/situation/reasoning for why the latest ClamAV release has been
pushed to all the mirrors but not updating via apt.
Thank you,
-Jim P.
Reply to: