[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Is policyd-weight a candidate for volatile?



Hi there,

I'm maintaining the package[1] of policyd-weight[2]. Beside the issue, that 
fighting against UBE is a fast moving target, which is the main goal of 
policyd-weight, there is also a known issue[3] in the version of etch.

Is the package a valid candidate for volatile and is fixing also the timeout 
issue via volatile the right way or is there some other way intended?

Thanks for you thoughts. With kind regards, Jan.
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/policyd-weight
[2] http://www.policyd-weight.org/
[3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.policyd-weight/611
-- 
Never write mail to <waja@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE
Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: pgpT9JoWSVr1Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: