Re: Bug#340462: gtk-gnutella: version in stable is too old for the network - upload to volatile
Hi,
* Anand Kumria (wildfire@progsoc.uts.edu.au) [060207 09:44]:
> [ I've removed 340462 from further follow-ups ]
just do what you promise to do.
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:08:58AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Anand Kumria (wildfire@progsoc.uts.edu.au) [060207 04:03]:
> > > Considering that volatile only useful package is (potentially) clamav
> > > and that only if you are disconnected I'd say you are better off
> > > rebuilding the package yourself and never using volatile.
> >
> > I would prefer if you stop telling lies about volatile.
>
> You can believe whatever you want to believe.
>
> I've done my analysis; I posted it publically.
>
> If there were obvious flaws in it, I'm sure you would have jumped upon
> them. From the lack of any kind of response I have to assume I have
> things correct.
You mean, I need to read and answer each and every mail? I hoped that
you might get more cooled down and reasonable again. I'm sorry that I
was wrong.
> You seem offended that that I'm pointing out that the idea is poorly
> executed upon.
No. I just don't like it when you tell lies. You can tell your opinion
where you want, but you must not say untrue statements and present them
as facts.
> There are a couple of ways to react:
>
> - move to rectify the (perceived or actual) problem
>
> - ignore things and hope I'll go away
>
> - respond with (attempted) insults
>
> You've done the last of those, I'm hopeful that you'll find the first
> one more profitable and rewarding.
As most of the readers might have noticed, we (the volatile team)
usually respond quite fast to good ideas, like the one with locales
(which was discussed before on IRC, and Felipe Augusto already wrote the
summary from the volatile-teams point of view, so there was no reason
for me to answer directly).
However, if there is a person who can't take a No as a No, and decides
to rather whine around, and start to tell lies, I have to take action.
Not that I like that most, but well, I can stand that.
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: