Re: AI slop or not?
clm@llg.one wrote:
> See reply below.
>
> On 1/7/26 8:47 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Michel Verdier wrote:
> >> I think they need better intelligence to better use their data.
> >
> > Actually i think that current AI lacks of disciplined and good
> > willing reasoning rather than of IQ.
> >
> > It is astounding how far ye olde Perceptron made it meanwhile by
> > being augmented with oddities like non-linear voodoo layers or
> > 8-bit floating point number arithmetic. Remembering the
> > intelligence tests of my younger years i'd expect to be beaten by
> > AI on many of their topics.
> >
> > But as small the space of combinations of xorrisofs arguments is
> > compared to the size of an AI parameter space, the AIs are still not
> > able to correcty answer a question like "How to modify a bootable
> > ISO of distro XYZ ?". (I pick up the debris of their flawed answers
> > in the internet.)
> >
> >
> > Joe wrote:
> >> The problem is that 'AI' is a hoax, there is no 'I'. What we have
> >> now is ELIZA with about a trillion times as many computer
> >> resources, but not a single bit more actual intelligence, since we
> >> don't know how to make that.
> >
> > We only know one way to make human intelligence and it is quite
> > similarly obscure as AI training if we consider the ~ 3.5 billion
> > years of evolution which enabled our mass production of humans. And
> > many of them will never qualify for what we as computer oriented
> > people are undisputedly willing to call "intelligence".
>
> Whose mass production of humans?
>
> Our God ALONE!
>
> He says, "I AM THAT I AM", He has always been and always will be
> forever!
>
> As mortal humans living a few decades at best, how can we suggest
> that "we" are producing people? Have scientists created life? They
> never will create because only God can create.
>
> I took the liberty to state my convictions here just as others were
> stating their beliefs.
>
> Have a good day! Remember each person has been influenced and will
> continue to influence, but only for time, not eternity. Let's prepare
> to give account of our actions.
Was that AI slop or not? Was it something worse? I'll get my coat...
> >> It's a large-scale expert system that hasn't been trained by
> >> experts.
Reply to: