Re: Using old (not systemd) system logs
I wrote:
> Text logs can be read with any of half a dozen or so commands in my
> path. They can be read with busybox. They can be read on systems
> lacking Systemd. They can be read on other operating systems.
tomás writes:
> I'd bet that any of those are using the sd_journal programming
> interface, thus link to libsystemd0.
Why would simple editors such as nano use that interface? It has
nothing to do with text files. Busybox depends only on libc6.
Busybox-static depends on nothing. libsystemd0 is not present on
Devuan, FreeBSD, or Microsoft Windows. All of the above can be used to
read text files. Which ones can read systemd journals?
--
John Hasler
john@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Reply to: