Re: The impact of removing rsyslog from Trixie
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 16:43:49 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> I admit it was poorly worded.
> It is not removed indeed,
> only not installed by default.
In other words, it's exactly the same as Bookworm. No change.
> The signal I got is an encouragement to abandon rsyslog which is redundant to journalctl.
>
> Poor wording aside, my question still holds:
> should I be paying attention to anything in particular?
As long as you remember to install rsyslog after the Trixie (or Bookworm)
installation, everything should continue to work normally.
If you're upgrading, then no special steps should be needed for rsyslog
to continue working. As far as I'm aware, anyway.
Reply to: