Re: mail sig separator (was Re: BD backup?)
On Tue 19 Nov 2024 at 15:32:47 (+0000), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue Nov 19, 2024 at 3:02 PM GMT, eben wrote:
> > That is what I see in the message to which you replied. See the <1k
> > attachment. This message also has a space. Is that not what you see?
>
> I'm afraid not. Looking at your message source, I see
>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> and
> =2D-
>
> So the sig separator is being content-encoded (which might be related)
> and the trailing space appears to have been stripped. You've also got
> format=flowed in the Content-Type. I love format=flowed! Perhaps your
> formatter is (incorrectly¹) stripping the trailing space as part of
> encoding for that?
Not only does it strip trailing space, but it destroys the
format=flowed for anyone who uses f=f in their reply.
But can I ask you why you stopped using f=f when you changed address.
Was it because you're now using quoted-printable for some reason,
rather than 8bit.
And perhaps I ought not to ask why the paragraph above is right-justified.
Cheers,
David.
Reply to: