Re: Bug in 'more' command
Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:48:07 +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Exporting MORE set to some unknown option (I did MORE=-q) leads to
> > more complaining and refusing service (so it seems to behave as if
> > one passed that option directly in the command line).
>
> D'oh!
>
> What a disaster. OK, now I have a better understanding of why people
> are complaining so vocally about this change.
>
> I still think that *conditionally* exporting MORE=-e (after performing
> whatever version-number-checking backflips are needed) is going to be
> a better solution than changing individual aliases one by one.
Hasn't the whole linus/unix world moved to using less instead or more?
--
Chris Green
·
Reply to: