Re: backup of backup or alternating backups?
On 2024-10-07, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> It was 18 years ago so I can't remember that clearly, but I think it was
> a mixture of inodes expense and an enlarged amount of CPU time with the
> file churn (mails moved from new to cur, and later to a separate archive
> Maildir, that sort of thing). It was probably ext3 given the time.
Ok I see. I use nnml so I have no new/cur moves. Also I add dateext
parameter for logrotate so old logs keep the same name.
Reply to: