[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Re: the 'original' string function?



On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 06:03:46PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> tomas wrote:
> 
> > ChatGPT is bullshit

This is not a comment, but the title of an academic article.
Worth reading, BTW.

Link is in my original post.

> Without context then:
> 
>   The comment "ChatGPT4 is bullshit" is not original as it is
>   a common expression used to express frustration [...]
> 
> Not a bad start!

I'd guess that this has been injected directly into ChatGPT. Perhaps
by an African worker [1], earning less than two dollars an hour.

> I agree that comment would score between 0 and 5 as it doesn't
> have any originality to it, really.

Uh -- it was a quote. They aren't supposed to be original.

Cheers

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jul/06/mercy-anita-african-workers-ai-artificial-intelligence-exploitation-feeding-machine
-- 
t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: