Re: Spam from the list?
Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> during the last moonths I get more mails from the debian-user list marked as
> spam than before. Something must have changed.
>
> I examined the header of the mails, but did not see any unusual.
>
> Below I send the header of an example of such a mail, maybe you can see the
> reason?
>
> On my computer I am also using spamassassin, and my own score is set to 3.4,
> so even so it should not considered as spam.
>
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
What sets these two headers?
> Authentication-Results: mail104c50.megamailservers.eu;
> dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (4096-bit key)
> header.d=4angle.com header.i=@4angle.com header.b="bS+3bWmq"
That's the source of the DKIM fail.
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on bendel.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=4.0 tests=BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,
>
> DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,LDO_WHITELIST,
> T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
> version=3.4.2
This is debian.org's mailserver checking for spam and deciding that it isn't,
even though DKIM is invalid.
> X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
> X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.561 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
> tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE=-2, DKIM_INVALID=0.1,
> DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249,
> LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01]
> autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
This is debian.org again.
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.053994, version=1.2.5
>
> --- snap ---
>
> Does one see any reason, why this is considered as spam???
Whatever set X-SPAM-FLAG: YES is probably at fault.
-dsr-
Reply to: