Re: Inclusive terminology (instead of master/slave) for network bonding/LACP
On 23.02.24 at 10:33, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote:
On 22.02.2024 11:19, Ralph Aichinger wrote:
Hello!
I know this is a loaded topic...
...
There is no good reason *why*. It's entirely US political feel-good
activism
Statement one above proven.
...
All it does is wastes tens of thousands of people's time once the have
to fix
If there's a single person in the world who feels existing terminology
to hurt them, I consider my usage of such terms.
If it makes one person feel better, I think I did something good.
If it makes others feel worse, I have to balance arguments. Arguments
such as "it was always thus" or "it's too much effort" are not strong ones.
As it happens, I prefer being called "woke" above being rude.
Oh, and tech and culture can not be separated, but that's probably also
a loaded topic.
Cheers,
Arno
--
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
Sandstr. 6, 49080 Osnabrück
Reply to: