[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Inclusive terminology (instead of master/slave) for network bonding/LACP



Dnia 2024-02-23, o godz. 10:54:09
<tomas@tuxteam.de> napisał(a):

> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:33:08AM +0100, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote:
> > On 22.02.2024 11:19, Ralph Aichinger wrote:  
> > > Hello!
> > > 
> > > I know this is a loaded topic. I really don't want to discuss the
> > > political aspects of the "why", but just want to know the facts,
> > > i.e. how far this has been progressed in Debian.  
> > 
> > There is no good reason *why*. It's entirely US political feel-good
> > activism  
> [...]
> 
> Oh, goody. A culture warrior.
> 
> *plonk*
> 

Me? Exactly opposite, I'm against bringing culture into tech, it's the
OP that decided to.

It's a pair of words that worked well for decades for the purpose. Now
someone decided to do some feel good activism and just add work for no
gain. I'm against that.

-- 
Mariusz Gronczewski (XANi) <xani666@gmail.com>
GnuPG: 0xEA8ACE64
https://devrandom.eu


Reply to: