Re: Inclusive terminology (instead of master/slave) for network bonding/LACP
Am 23.02.2024 schrieb <tomas@tuxteam.de>:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:33:08AM +0100, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote:
> > On 22.02.2024 11:19, Ralph Aichinger wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I know this is a loaded topic. I really don't want to discuss the
> > > political aspects of the "why", but just want to know the facts,
> > > i.e. how far this has been progressed in Debian.
> >
> > There is no good reason *why*. It's entirely US political feel-good
> > activism
> [...]
>
> Oh, goody. A culture warrior.
I'm sure you have good reasons for changing the terms. Feel free to
provide some real arguments that have a benefit for the users.
Reply to: