Re: partition reporting full, but not
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:21:15PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>
> On 20/2/24 19:38, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> Tomas, the upgrade failure was earlier than these notes. It has now worked
I see.
> Sorry, but I don't know how to assess the snapshot space usage.
Nor do I -- my question was rather directed at Felix, who seems to
be the only one in this thread with some btrfs experience.
Perhaps it'd be wise to include "btrfs" in the Subject to attract
the attention of btrfs buffs?
Cheers
--
t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- From: Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- From: Keith Bainbridge <keithrbau@gmail.com>
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- From: debian-user@howorth.org.uk
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- From: Keith Bainbridge <keithrbau@gmail.com>
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- From: Keith Bainbridge <keithrbau@gmail.com>
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- From: Keith Bainbridge <keithrbau@gmail.com>
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- Re: partition reporting full, but not
- From: Keith Bainbridge <keithrbau@gmail.com>