Re: Image handling in mutt

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Image handling in mutt
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 08:41:33 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 87y1e33gzm.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20231208165612.wowcysfomcrc7khu@yosemite.mars.lan> <[🔎] ZXNMtnYowOQYmScV@axis.corp> <[🔎] 20231208212912.jjc4z3rei4g6obyj@yosemite.mars.lan> <[🔎] CAMPXz=oDACdKREYtqbL5nfPDzivpnOn3WK0yFPxUiZn-nX2iTg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 6fea6664-1ee6-45dc-8a70-ad50c57a655b@columbus.rr.com>

On Friday,  8 Dec 2023 at 17:06, Pocket wrote:
> In Unix and Linux there isn't a file extension, that is a microsoft
> invention.

Predates MS by years.  Systems like RSTS/E on PDP-11s, just to name one.
-- 
Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 30.0.50 2023-09-14) on Debian 12.2

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Image handling in mutt
  - From: Curt <curty@free.fr>

References:
- Image handling in mutt
  - From: Paul M Foster <paulf@quillandmouse.com>
- Re: Image handling in mutt
  - From: David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
- Re: Image handling in mutt
  - From: Paul M Foster <paulf@quillandmouse.com>
- Re: Image handling in mutt
  - From: David <bouncingcats@gmail.com>
- Re: Image handling in mutt
  - From: Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Apt 2 not fully installed or removed.
Next by Date: Re: ToG Linux (first draft of a RFC) ...
Previous by thread: Re: Image handling in mutt
Next by thread: Re: Image handling in mutt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread