On 9/2/23 15:26, Michel Verdier wrote:
On 2023-09-02, David Christensen wrote:What statistics are other readers seeing for similar use-cases and their backup solutions?I have 83 backups resulting to 130% of data. So a ratio of 63:1.
Nice.
But because of performance limitation I don't use compression on backup server.
What partitioning scheme, volume manager, file system, etc., do you use on your backup server?
What is the performance limitation? If you wanted compression on the backup server, how would you implement it?
And also rsync deduplication is less consuming than zfs.
Please define your system and metrics. David