Re: Disk writes much slower in Bookworm i386 [Was: svnadmin dump ...]

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Disk writes much slower in Bookworm i386 [Was: svnadmin dump ...]
From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:32:39 +0700
Message-id: <[🔎] ubeo48$fqj$2@ciao.gmane.io>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 000101d9cefa$3b93d430$b2bb7c90$@org>
References: <[🔎] 000101d9cefa$3b93d430$b2bb7c90$@org>

On 15/08/2023 04:56, kjohnson@eclypse.org wrote:

I have done additional research, and it now appears that programs that
do extensive disk writes run much slower (3-6x) in Bookworm than they
did in Bullseye.

Have you compared kernel IO schedulers? May it be a case of SSD vs HDDoptimizing?


grep '' /sys/block/*/queue/scheduler

Reply to:

References:
- Disk writes much slower in Bookworm i386 [Was: svnadmin dump ...]
  - From: <kjohnson@eclypse.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Upgrade to Bookworm, now GNOME keyring dies--no access to stored SSH key passwords
Next by Date: why would ping and traceroute give you different IP addresses?
Previous by thread: Re: Disk writes much slower in Bookworm i386 [Was: svnadmin dump ...]
Next by thread: why would ping and traceroute give you different IP addresses?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread