Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 10:34:04AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 04:30:46PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > So the practice is that the whole internet dumps the whole framework
> > schtack [2] on you.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebAssembly
We need better craftspeople, not better tools.
And no, I'm not actually blaming the people themselves, but an
environment which doesn't encourage that.
Cheers
--
t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?
- From: Bret Busby <bret@busby.net>
- Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?
- From: Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com>
- Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
- From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
- From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
- From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
- From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
- From: Bret Busby <bret@busby.net>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
- From: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br>
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
- Re: Firefox resource utilization (was Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?)
- From: Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>