|
Hello
Thank You
What shall I do
to be able to print?
Regards
Sophie
Why does Linux support HP?
Von: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. April 2023 23:17 An: debian-user@lists.debian.org <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Betreff: Re: EPSON ET M 1120 new printer: If You can read this, you are using the wrong driver On Fri 14 Apr 2023 at 19:06:08 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2023-04-14 at 18:52, Brian wrote: > > > On Fri 14 Apr 2023 at 18:22:09 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > > > >> On 2023-04-14 at 18:10, Brian wrote: > > >> > You could consider: > >> > > >> > * Stating the Debain OS being used. > >> > * Giving the printer make and model. > >> > >> The make *was* stated: Epson. > >> > >> The model may also have been stated, albeig only in the Subject line: ET > >> M1120. From a bit of Googling, the "ET" appears to stand for "EcoTank". > > > > The EPSON ET M 1120 doesn't exist. Do we have to guess its correct name as well > > as any other relevant information? > > When I searched for > > Epson ET M 1120 > > I got a suggestion that I may have meant "M1120" instead of the last two > search terms, and hits for the "Epson EcoTank ET M1120" and/or "Epson > EcoTank M1120", which look to be different names for the same model and > to be a fairly clear match. > > While, yes, specifying the exact name clearly would be preferable, this > is far from unreasonably difficult to figure out. I decided to take your signature as a template for my original response :). > >> > * Specifying the connection method. USB. Network. > >> > * Giving the exact error message and where it came from. > >> > >> Also: > >> > >> * Starting a new thread to discuss the matter, rather than replying > >> to an existing message deep in an existing thread, deleting the > >> body, and changing the Subject line before sending. > >> > >> (This question, and its replies, are appearing as responses to a > >> mail from Michael Stone in the 'update-initramfs' thread.) > > > > I haven't a clue what you are going on about here. Shift-L in mutt > > was used at this end. > > Your replies to the OP have been fine, AFAIK. The OP's message was > itself a reply, as can be seen by looking at its headers (In-Reply-To: > and References:), but was otherwise presented as if it had been the > start of a new thread; that is not fine, because it hides the "new > thread" inside of the existing one, at least for anyone using a threaded > view of the list of messages. That's an issue for the OP, not me. -- Brian. |