Re: Apt sources.list
On 2023-04-15 21:59:19 +0200, Frank wrote:
> Op 15-04-2023 om 18:12 schreef Tixy:
> > On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 08:11 -0400, paulf@quillandmouse.com wrote:
>
> > > According to https://www.debian.org/releases/, bookworm at this time is
> > > "testing". But when the next release comes, bookworm will still be
> > > bookworm, but "testing" will be bookworm "plus". I'd like to follow
> > > testing, regardless of the status of Debian official releases.
> > >
> > > So... in my sources.list, if I change "bookworm" to "testing", will it
> > > do that, and (other than the instabilities of testing) is there any
> > > liability to it?
> >
> > Testing doesn't get explicit security support so there's no point in
> > having 'testing-security' lines in sources.list (I guess it'll give an
> > error anyway).
>
> No error. It exists but as a perpetually empty repository.
This is incorrect.
cventin:~> apt-show-versions -a libtpms-dev
libtpms-dev:amd64 0.9.2-3.1~deb12u1 testing-security security.debian.org
No stable version
No stable-updates version
libtpms-dev:amd64 0.9.2-3.1 testing ftp.debian.org
libtpms-dev:amd64 0.9.2-3.1 unstable ftp.debian.org
No experimental version
libtpms-dev:amd64 not installed
libtpms-dev:i386 0.9.2-3.1~deb12u1 testing-security security.debian.org
No stable version
No stable-updates version
libtpms-dev:i386 0.9.2-3.1 testing ftp.debian.org
libtpms-dev:i386 0.9.2-3.1 unstable ftp.debian.org
No experimental version
libtpms-dev:i386 not installed
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Reply to: