On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 02:59:49PM +0100, Alain D D Williams wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 03:48:31PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 02:01:27PM +0100, Alain D D Williams wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > While we are talking about this, is there any reason why all the http: should > > > not be https: ? > > > > It's just unnecessary CPU on the server, that's all. > > That used to be the case many years ago. Modern CPUs have instructions that > make it much quicker. It may be /less/ than it used to be (what would interest me is the overall energy consumption, joules/megabyte or so). But it is nonzero. And still, it's unnecessary. Cheers -- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature