Re: What's the correct procedure for replacing a DKMS module when it's upstreamed?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: What's the correct procedure for replacing a DKMS module when it's upstreamed?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 17:07:29 +0000
- Message-id: <ZCB70Q+2/W/CHWha@bitfolk.com>
- In-reply-to: <ZB/PTTjABG3aa7/F@bitfolk.com>
- References: <ZB/PTTjABG3aa7/F@bitfolk.com>
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 04:51:25AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> I have to build the kernel driver as an external DKMS
> module from:
>
> https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw89
>
> Specifically that is the rtw_8852be module.
>
> That works fine, but it seems that this driver actually is present
> in upstream kernel versions somewhere in v6.1.x.
After asking about this on debian-kernel it was pointed out that the
driver is not actually functional until somewhere in the 6.2
upstream kernel, so is unlikely to be making it to a 6.1 LTS kernel
that will be found in bookworm.
It may be in the trixie kernel package and/or I may end up getting
it from some future bookworm-backports kernel package, so the
question still remains about the proper way to transition from a
DKMS to an included module.
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Reply to: