Re: Libembree, but static

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Libembree, but static
From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 09:48:34 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] ZAdOwhtRQX1QheEO@connexer.com>
Mail-followup-to: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CACS5Re_Z+dstPXFG9RrM1UnNOUqbHFah0q3Uyka3WGSThv9tnQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CACS5Re_Z+dstPXFG9RrM1UnNOUqbHFah0q3Uyka3WGSThv9tnQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Julien D Arques wrote:
>    Hi,
>    We currently have libembree in .so shared library. Is it possible for the
>    maintainers to provide the static .a?
>    I use the latest available in testing 3.13.5
>    Thanks

I would recommend filing wishlist a bug against the libembree-dev
requesting inclusion of the static .a.  When static archives are shipped
they are generally shipped in the -dev package.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez

Reply to:

References:
- Libembree, but static
  - From: Julien D Arques <acc.gccquestions@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Looking for "Package Verification with dpkg: Implementation" Document
Next by Date: Re: Forcing dhclient to not ignore tun0 interface when it's available
Previous by thread: Libembree, but static
Next by thread: No /
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread